A pedagogical model of elearning at KVL: “The five-stage model of online learning" by Gilly Salmon
Anita Monty, , IT Learning
Center, KVL, 2005.
Summary of:
Salmon, G.: "E-tivities. The Key to Active Online Learning",
Taylor & Francis, 2002.
For online learners there is more than the subject to learn: they need to
learn the technical way of using the elearning system while they are studying
in it.
It is therefore important to provide a model of elearning in which the
participant very fast could explore the system and also learn how to
communicate online.
In this paper I will describe a model for e-learning courses of Gilly
Salmon, who is Professor of E-learning & Learning Technologies at the
University of Leicester, UK
Gilly Salmon has developed a model of structured e-learning activities
which have the purpose of creating greater interaction and
participation between participants in e-learning courses. She
believes and have experienced, that for online learning to be successful
and happy, participants need to be supported through a structured
developmental process.
The model is a “scaffolding” model. Scaffolding means gradually building on
participant’s previous experience. A structured learning scaffold offers
essential support and development to participants at each stage as they
build up expertise in learning online.
I hope that the five-stage model of Gilly Salmon would inspire teachers at
KVL who are planning e-learning courses.
E-learning and isolation
Working online creates a wide range of feelings in students (and teachers,
as well) and very often it tend to be the experience of isolation.
Isolation has two dimensions. One is distance in place (being alone) and
the other is psychological (distance in thoughts, feeling alone).
I hope that the five-stage model can be a tool for teachers to create
learning processes which are breaking down the feelings of isolation.
Change the model for the future
Probably you will like to change and develop this model to your
needs. The model must be fulfilled with design of concrete activities
to each KVL elearning course. These activities - e-tivities - are
to be organized according to courses of KVL .
The ideas of e-tivities are based largely on participants “making sense” of
material through interaction with their peers and with their e-moderators.
This is why Salmon always suggest that each e-tivity, at all stages of the
model, includes a response to the messages of others to start to build
participation. From research we are aware that groups do not find it easy
to work virtually.
Because of the e-tivities the students are active involved and from stage 3
they begin to work more collaboratively which means they begin to exchange
information with each other. This means that the teacher will not be the
person who always has to answer all questions, and the teacher doesn’t have
to log on so often.
Structured, paced and carefully constructed e-tivities reduce the amount of
e-moderator time, and directly affect satisfactory learning outcomes,
adding value to the investment.
Designing e-tivities is a creative task and might take a little more time
than you think. The advantage is that it is fun and you can use the
activities in other courses – not only in KVL elearning but also in the
traditional teaching within the new study reform at KVL.
E-tivities and the future of learning
Gilly Salmon writes in her book “E-tivities – the key to active online
learning” that the key to active and interactive online teaching and
learning lies in bringing us greater interaction and group
participation. She believes that from these small beginnings a new
body of practice will build up around e-tivities that will transfer to new
technologies as they become available. She also writes that the need for
skilful e-moderations will not disappear, regardless of how sophisticated
and fast-moving the technological environments become. E-moderators add the
real value to learning technologies by designing and running e-tivities.
The participants learn to use the system through five stages. Each stage
requires participants to master certain technical skills. Each stage calls
for different e-moderating skills. At first at stage 1, the participants
interact only with one or two others. After stage 2, the numbers of others
with whom they interact, and the frequency, gradually increases, although
stage 5 often results in a return to more individual pursuits.
This description of the model is from Salmons book: “E-tivities – the key
to active online learning”:
The model (short describtion):
Stage 1:
Individual access and the induction of participants into online learning
are essential prerequisites for online conference participation.
Stage 2:
Involves individual participants establishing their online identities and
then finding others to whom they interact.
Stage 3:
Participants engage in mutual exchange of information. Up to and including
stage 3, a form of co-operation occurs whereby each person supports the
other participants’ goals.
Stage 4:
Course-related group discussions develop and the interaction becomes more
collaborative. Knowledge construction and working towards a group goal.
Collaboration requires an active sharing of information and intellectual
resources amongst the participants.
(The term "collaborative learning" refers to an instruction
method in which students at various performance levels work together in
small groups toward a common goal. The students are responsible for one
another's learning as well as their own. Thus, the success of one
student helps other students to be successful.)
Stage 5:
Participants look for more benefits from the system to help them achieve
personal goals and reflect on the learning processes.
More detailed description:
Stage 1 – Access and motivation: E-tivities need to
concentrate on providing explicit motivation and set the pace and rhythm.
E-tivities need to be designed carefully to enable the participants to find
their way around the online learning platform whilst taking part in
relevant and authentic tasks. The participants might be nervous at this
stage about how participants are expected to behave and who is online with
them. Make a start on e-tivities that address these concerns and help
people to feel more comfortable. Try to avoid the “Post your first message
here and say who you are” type of message. It will frighten some of the
participants.
Stage 2 - Socialization: E-tivities at stage 2 need to
focus on enabling participants to relate to a few others and on reasonable
stretching tasks. E-tivities at this stage should provide ways of knowing
who else is in the shared space and how this knowledge can be used to guide
participants’ work.
Provide practice, practice and practice – not in the technology, but in
working together. Relate e-tivities to the traditions of the discipline
because this provides the important cultural context for learning and makes
later knowledge construction easier to achieve.
Stage 3 – Information Exchange: E-tivities at stage 3
should have a strong task and action focus. Use stage 3 e-tivities for
prioritizing content, enabling participants to impart information to each
other and explain and clarify. They should be shown how to provide feedback
to each other and explain and clarify. They should be shown how to provide
feedback to each other in the spirit of deepening understanding. This will
help them prepare to move to stage 4 e-tivities.
E-tivities at stage 3 may focus on exploring co-ordination and
communication between the participants so that each participant work
towards his or her own objectives within the overall e-tivity. Later
e-tivities at stage 3 can look towards more co-operation and support for
each person’s needs and objectives. At this stage you can experiment with
the structure of groups and the techniques for group working. (for example:
each group has an assigned task which culminates in a plenary debate).
Stage 4 – Knowledge construction: Arrived at stage 4 the
students should now be able to: become adept to working online, managing
their time and at working with each other.
Objectives at stage 4 can be related to broadening understanding, providing
different viewpoints and perspectives and examples. Avoid specifying in
advance exactly what has to be learnt at this point, but ground e-tivities
in real-world contexts.
At stage 4 you can move increasingly towards peer-directed e-tivities and
participant work teams. You could try, for instance, defining a group
outcome, or asking the group to provide its own goal and objectives and
give directions on how to collaborate.
Stage 5 – Development: E-tivities here can be about
gaining self-insight and on reflecting and making judgements on the
experience and the knowledge surfaced and built. To develop e-tivities that
enable evaluation and critique of all kinds. Ask participants to
demonstrate their ability to work with content and defend their own
judgements. Encourage them to explore their metacognitive awareness of
positions they adopt – for example: How did you arrive at that position? Or
which is better and why? Don’t forget to explore feelings and emotions
about learning, as an experience of the topics.
Building e-tivities: Key principles:
-
Decide in advance of the participants logging on what you expect them to
do and what the e-moderator will do.
-
Ensure that the participants are clear about your intented objectives for
an e-tivity. Start with the end in mind.
-
Ensure that your planned evaluation or assessment meets the purpose(s) of
the e-tivity. If assessment is involved, look for alignment with tasks.
-
Build in motivation as part of the process of undertaking the e-tivity
itself and not as something separate from it. Motivation occurs because
of the learning activities. Avoid trying to motivate people simply to log
on and “discuss”. Instead, provide an e-tivity that makes taking part
worthwhile in itself. This includes setting short-term goals but ensuring
that there is a satisfying process and “flow” of actions. In practice,
e-moderators need to exercise judgement about when to go with the flow
and when to guide participants towards expected outcomes.
-
Be highly sensitive to timing and pacing. Divide the e-tivity up into
bite-sized chunks of no more than two or three weeks work for a complete
e-tivity – less if possible.
-
If you offer more than one e-tivity at a time, build them together in a
coherent way to create a “programme”. Use the five-stage model.
-
Ensure that the e-tivities are in some way focused on sharing, shaping,
elaborating or deepening understanding.
-
Ensure that participants need to work together in some way to achieve the
learning outcomes.
-
Be generous in allocating e-moderator time, especially if the e-tivity is
geared towards stages 1-3.
-
Be ready, be prepared and don’t be surprised at serendipitous events.
-
Aim to provide just one invitational message, which contains everything
needed to take part.
And now to start the e-tivities…
1. Preparing guide
Start with the end in mind
What do you want to achieve by this online activity? How will it add to the
participants’ learning? How will you assess or evaluate the e-tivity?
First thing first!
How will you introduce and start the e-tivity off? How much notice will the
participants need? Can you design clear invitational messages?
Think win: win
Why will people want to take part? Will it add obvious and clear value to
their learning? How will the group work together?
Sharpen the saw
How will you prepare yourself to make this e-tivity a success? What
preparations or resources will the participants need to take part?
Be proactive
Plan the e-moderator role and actions. How often will you need to
intervene?
What will you do about non-participants? Be realistic about the timings but
be prepared to adjust them if necessary.
Seek to understand
What happens if the e-tivity doesn’t go as you planned? How can you get
information to change it for next time?
E-moderate
Plan what you have to do to make this all work while the e-tivity is
running.
2. Action guide
Time and course planning
When designing e-tivities and providing invitations to take part, you need
to take account of the time you expect participants to be online,
responding both to your e-tivities invitations and to each other. It is not
that difficult to determine how long they may need to respond individually
to your instructions. It’s harder to tell how long they’ll need to spend
responding to each other. E-lapsed time: Salmon suggest that what might
take a half an hour with a group of 10 face to face might take one week
elapsed time online, if each participant came back three times,
read other people’s messages and posted three of his or her own. The
elapsed time is just as important as the actual online time because
participants may think a little about the e-tivities whilst going about
their everyday tasks and engaging in “reflection.”
At stages 1-3 the e-moderator will need to spend a fair amount of time
getting the e-tivities going. At stages 4 and 5 he or she can log on less
often, but doing good plenary and summaries can be demanding.
Group work
Create some groups for the students to be member of the first time they log
on. It can be overwhelming for some students to write for a big forum of
people. Therefore it will be better to start the communication within a
smaller group of people. Remember that e-learning is different because of
the written communication and for some people it means that they can be
afraid of writing anything at all in the beginning. We therefore recommend
tostart with smaller groups.
With larger groups there is a risk that individuals will not participate
because they see that others have already made the point they wish to make.
The volume of messages tends to put off all but the most active
participants, and lurking and vicarious learning are common.
Smallish groups work most easily online. Each individual comes to know
other members of the group more easily – each is encouraged to contribute
actively and more sustained engagement is thus achieved.
On the other hand, there are also risks with small groups. With a group of
say six, if one or two drop out for any reason, those that are left behind
feel bereft and put-upon, and the group may have too few members be
self-sustaining.
Stage 1 e-tivities are also often slow to get started because of technical
problems. Gilly Salmon suggest that you run stage 1 e-tivities with larger
groups and allow a little more time.
How to start and build the activities
1. First of all you must plan the activities. E-tivities require careful
construction. Most of the groundwork should be prepared in advance of the
participants’ arrival.
In this guide you find some examples of activities from an elearning course
in Agricultural Development. You can use these examples just adding your
own changes.
2. You start at stage 1 by giving some information to the students in
welcome messages. For each e-tivity you should write an invitational
message. In the invitational message you put a spark for the activities:
you present an issue: a dilemma, problem, challenge or model. At the end in
this guide you find information and examples on e-tivities for stage 1-5.
You can use the examples eventually with your own changes.
It is a good idea to develop e-tivities that address issues of working in
online time from stage 1 onwards. At stage 3 and 4, you can find a way to
relate the activities to your discipline.
3. When you have finished all your invitational messages (write them in
Word) then you can put the documents into the KVL elearning course. Make it
a program of “sessions”.
You need to be very specific about who is in which group in your e-tivity
invitational message. Unlike in face-to-face situations, where participants
can quickly and easily sort themselves into groups, it is possible to waste
a week just getting into teams online. You might use criteria such as month
of birth or surnames when you sort the students for some groups.
Invitational message for e-tivity should include:
-
The purpose of the e-tivity (why the participants are doing it). If the
e-tivities are assessed, indicate what might indicate success and how
participants can achieve it.
-
What participants should do and how they can go about doing it
-
How long it should or could take. An idea of when the e-tivity starts
and when it should finish
-
How the participants should work together
Principles of online communication
Don’t assume that your participants know much about communicating via
computers, sending mail, contributing in conferences, etc. Let them
surprise you!
-
Remember in any face-to-face group some people will always need
encouragement to contribute. Others will want to hog the airspace, too.
In our online world the former group are invisible!
-
It takes time and experience to get used to communicating and learning
online – even those who are highly IT literate.
The way people communicate online is a unique and evolving mix of written
and spoken communication. In on-screen text messages, people tend to write
as if they were talking.
But written instructions need to be completely clear.
Everything that is “said” in an elearning course is available for viewing
and reviewing by everyone (since it is written and will not be removed from
the discussions board). Be very careful about what and how you are writing
– students can be offended. And then they can read it again and again.
It is important to be brief both in your stimulus and in your invitations –
no more than one screenfull – and to indicate clearly the kind of brevity
you expect in response.
Remember that online messages, even well-planned ones, can very easily be
ambiguous or misinterpreted. An e-moderator does not have quite the same
opportunity for spontaneously putting participants’ right or back on track
as a face-to-face facilitator does.
Be prepared, during the e-tivity event itself, for directions to be taken
that are unexpected or for e-tivities to be challenged in various ways
(this is especially likely to happen from stage 3 onwards).
You can compare this to traditional teaching: you have a plan for your
teaching, but you know that the interaction of the students always makes
you change your plans a bit during your teaching lessons.
Replying
Timeliness in replying to messages is critical. If, as e-moderator, you are
too quick in responding, you may find you are in online dialogue with
yourself! You can choose when you respond to conference
messages. Sometimes you might want to respond immediately, sometimes
reflect first, sometimes we may wish to avoid intervening at that moment.
While we are deciding, though, more messages might appear.
Here are some options about when to reply:
-
Reply immediately on reading (this may be several days after the message
was sent)
-
Acknowledge immediately and reply later (don’t forget make a note
somewhere)
-
Ignore temporarily (others may reply or build on messages before you do)
-
Ignore completely (not recommended as an encouraging strategy)
You have options of routes too:
-
Post to the KVL elearning in “messages” or in “discussion board” (where
everyone can see your response)
-
Post to the KVL elearning in “messages” or in “discussion board” (where
everyone can see your response + E-mail to the individual’s private
mailbox (you can do this at same time in messages in KVL elearning)
-
E-mail to the individual’s private mailbox (only the individual sees
this, and no one else knows you have responded)
-
Web camera
-
Telephone
-
Face to face if you normally meet them this way
Emotional Quotient
There are many factors involved in personal abilities that contribute to
learning and achieving. One major aspect is known as emotional quotient
(EQ). Try to bring this aspect into your way of communicating with students
in KVL elearning.
Try to:
-
Always acknowledging feelings and offering support. Allow the feelings of
everyone involved in e-tivities to be surfaced, owned, expressed and
respected.
-
Use smileys and emoticons
J
– you find examples of these in the chat room in KVL
elearning
-
Describe the emotion in words,
for ex. When I read about …I felt I had to congratulate you
for ex. I felt uncomfortable when…
-
Describe your body language
for ex. When I read your message, I jumped for joy
for ex. I smiled when I read about…
for ex. Ha, Ha, I said out loud!
-
Avoid ways of writing and communicating that suggest angry response
for ex. CAPITAL LETTERS or lots of punctuation marks!!!!
-
Write in an informal manner
The e-moderator role: Weaving and summarizing
What you do in traditional teaching are to weave the content of the course
and course materials and to make it into spoken explanations to the
students. These perspectives from you give the students a possibility to
make sense of the content.
In e-learning you can do the same. You can weave the content of the
messages in discussions together in responses from you. After some
responses from the students you put the most important together in a
summarizing message from you.
The most time-consuming aspect of e-moderating is making good summaries.
Summaries save a huge amount of participants’ time, and increase learning
and feedback. Students can be informed very fast by reading a summary
instead of reading all the messages of a discussion or an e-tivity. Even
the student has read all the messages from the other participants the
summary becomes useful later on when the students read and study for
examines.
Summaries are a particular boon to latecomers, who may otherwise be daunted
by the number of messages awaiting them when they log on. Summaries can
also provide an opportunity to encourage participants to contribute: if no
one is prepared to offer a full summary, then participants can be
encouraged to offer one or two suggestions that the e-moderator can then
build up into a summary.
This will make it very easy for all students to follow the actions and
discussion even they haven’t logged on for some days.
Weaving, archiving and summarizing are key tasks for e-moderators and add
much value to e-tivities. Students can also usefully acquire and contribute
these skills. Or the role of summarizer can be taken by two or three people
working collaboratively (however, this takes up more time).
Whoever undertakes the summary should always invite comment, by the
original contributors, on its sufficiency and interpretation.
Weaving of contributions: To use quotes from a number of different messages
during an online discussion and weave them together in a message.
Summarizing:
-
To weave and acknowledge the variety of ideas and contributions
-
To refocus discussion and activity when postings are too numerous.
Summarize after each 20 messages, at a pre-agreed time or at regular
intervals, for example every three days. In a large or busy e-tivity this
can be done daily.
-
To refocus discussion and activity when postings have strayed from the
topic.
-
To refocus and promote activity when e-tivities are going well.
-
To signal closure of the e-tivity
-
To provide fresh starting points for broadening and deepening discussion
-
To remind students of the journey they have travelled
-
To reinforce and “imprint” new information and knowledge
-
To provide a “spark” for a new e-tivity
Archiving
Archiving is to remove messages to a different place in the elearning
course. The messages must still be easily retrievable by the participants.
Archives help enormously to prevent e-tivity discussions becoming
overwhelming, particularly for newcomers and at stage 1 and 2.
Archiving is excellent as a way of filing away sets of discussions for
later use or as reference or research material, for others who want to
revisit the discussions.
Principles to hold at the front of your mind when e-moderating
-
Acknowledge and appreciate participants’ contributions. They may have
laboured for hours to get a simple “Hello!” onto the discussions. A
little praise goes a long way.
-
Be welcoming.
-
If you disagree with a participant, restate his or her point, to
acknowledge it, and then state your view.
-
Finish your message with an open question – even a request for
confirmation or other views will help a lot
How to get ideas for e-tivities
-
Think about your e-tivities in relation to you wider community, your
discipline, your department and your latest research. What is really
important in these areas? Use the key issue as a spark.
-
Scan the literature for what’s coming up and what might be important in
the future, and use these ideas as goals and purposes for e-tivities.
Create and convey vision and forward thinking in your students.
-
Recognize and celebrate effective learning that emerges. Especially
highlight true engagement with a topic and with the construction of
knowledge. Encourage the sharing of academic insights.
-
Work together with your colleagues to improve good practice in your
e-tivities. Share ideas within disciplines and across them.
General advice to e-learning teacher and moderator in KVL
elearning
To be a successful e-moderator of
collaborative groups, you need to:
-
Be able to plan structured and paced e-tivities
-
Be able to run successful e-tivities
-
Be able to value and enhance contribution from all members of your
learning groups
-
Be able to choose and deploy a wide range of techniques for group working
in a purpose way
-
Be able to appreciate and deploy understandings of sharing of knowledge,
co-operation, collaboration
-
Be able to weave and summarize contributions to e-tivities
Be a good model of online behaviour:
-
Start on time
-
Get people to start together and to move on together
-
Give them a reason for being online
-
Help them to develop a habit of coming back
-
The e-moderator sets the environment and tone – make it welcoming
-
Small interventions go a long way in providing support
-
Encourage people to talk rather than giving them the answers. You can end
your messages and responses with question to be answered.
-
Log on regularly –mostly needed in stage 1-3.
Inform the students of this
-
The best way for them to e-learn is to log on regularly and taking part –
for example each day for half an hour or one hour instead of once a week.
-
They will learn by reading messages from other students but they will
learn more and better if they take active part by writing responses to
the messages.
-
The importance of writing messages in a good tone – they should be
constructive and supporting to the other students
How to handle troubles
Gilly Salmon has some suggestions to handle troubles in elearning:
-
If a participant seems to be in trouble (spotted either by
non-contribution or cries for help), an e-moderator should offer
immediate help, or direct the participant to a source of help (especially
if the problems is technical).
-
The e-moderator should ask the participants a few pointed questions about
exactly what they are trying to achieve and what they perceive the
problem to be before offering help. Try also to establish what they know
already. Then offer a way forward.
-
If this does not solve the problem then very much more explicit
instructions should be given, perhaps through another medium of
communication. It may even be necessary to get someone to sit with the
student and go through what to do – to bring in local face-to-face help.
-
No “dependency” should be set up, however, and as soon as the student
shows signs of taking part, he or she should be directed back into the
group e-tivities. The participant may need a little more acknowledging
and praising than average for a while.
Invitations
The invitational messages to the e-tivities can include:
-
The purpose of the e-tivity (why the participants are doing it). If the
e-tivities are assessed, indicate what might indicate success and how
participants can achieve it.
-
What participants should do and how they can go about doing it
-
How long it should or could take. An idea of when the e-tivity starts
and when it should finish
-
How the participants should work together
Examples of e-tivities in KVL
eLearning:
|
Module:
Student background and expectations
|
E-TIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
An
e-tivity usually requires that you participate in an on-line
discussion. We want you to get an excellent learning outcome from
this course. Therefore, we expect you
to:
-
Log on regularly and take
part in the discussions. Log on each day for half an hour to one
hour, rather than just once a week. As a minimum, please visit
and take part in the course at least three times per week.
This will
help you all to keep working together.
-
Successfully completing
at least 80 per cent of the modules. Stick to the deadlines for
completing exercises and modules.
You will learn from reading
other students' messages but you will learn more and better if
you take active part in the discussions by writing messages
yourself. Remember that all messages should be
constructive.
The e-tivities in this
Introductory module will take place in small groups. Group
discussions take place under the heading "Discussions" in
the left-hand menu. The groups are (members
were randomly selected):
|
Groups
|
Members
|
|
Shorea
|
Aske,
Erik F, Annebeth, Michael, Jude, Chloe
|
|
Dalbergia
|
Søren, Pernille,
Jacob, Devendra, Elsebeth
|
|
Swietenia
|
Klaus, Ulla,
Marika, Mariéve, Erik R, Egbe
|
In this Introductory module, there are four e-tivities to be
completed. Details are provided below on the standard e-tivity
format.
|
E-tivity 0.1:
Getting started
|
|
Purpose:
to let group
members know that you have arrived
|
|
Task:
Go to the group
discussion page. Find your group. Answer the welcome
message from Carsten (your humble e-moderator and
teacher), with just a couple of words, in your group to
say you are here, ready to start work.
|
|
Deadline:
Must be completed
by Thursday 1 September at 22.00 CET.
|
|
E-tivity 0.2:
Been to the jungle?
|
|
Purpose:
to practice
writing a message
|
|
Task:
Have you been
inside a forest in a developing country? If yes, respond
to the query posted by Carsten, just a few
lines, in your group about where and why. If no, respond
with a few lines about where you would like to go
and why.
|
|
Deadline:
Must be completed
by Thursday 1 September at 22.00 CET.
|
|
E-tivity 0.3:
Been here before?
|
|
Purpose:
to share
experience of e-learning and expectations to the
course
|
|
Task:
Write a message
in your group of your experiences as an on-line learner
until now and your expectations to this course.
Respond to the
contributions of others in your group.
|
|
Deadline:
Must be completed
by Friday 2 September at noon (12.00 CET).
|
|
E-tivity 0.4:
Reflection time
|
|
Purpose:
to reflect on how
your own experience will help you to provide help and
advice to the other students
|
|
Task:
Write
a message in your group about your thoughts at the
end of this Introductory module. What have you found
useful? What have you found harder than expected? If you
wish, you can prepare your message offline using a word
processor, then copy and paste it into the message.
Respond to one reflection by another student that helps
you.
|
|
Deadline:
Must be completed
by Monday 5 September at noon (12.00 CET).
|
Congratulations on having done your first set of e-tivities.
Remember to also complete the questionnaire. Next step is to
complete the first core module on "Paradigms in tropical
forestry".
|
|
Message in the grouprooms:
Welcome to the first e-tivity! You are a member of the
Dalbergia group. Dalbergia is a large genus of tropical trees
cultivated commercially for their dramatically grained and coloured
timbers :-) The genus includes tree species such as Indian rosewood
and kingwood from Brazil.
The purpose of this first e-tivity is to make all group members
announce that they are here. Joining us in cyberspace. Ready to
start the course. To let the other group members know that you have
arrived, answer this welcoming message. Press the
"Answer" button below and write just a couple of words.
Then you have completed the first e-tivity.
Carsten
Your humble e-moderator and teacher
|
|
Message in the grouprooms:
Good to have you on-board. Actually, going by water is sometimes
the easiest way to get deep into heavily forested areas, such as
the central Amazon. Did you ever visit a forest in a developing
country? Perhaps you grew up near one, or perhaps you have yet to
experience your first visit?
In this second e-tivity, please write a message to the others in
the group. Just a few lines is sufficient. If you have been to a
forest in a developing country, tell about where and why. If you
haven't, tell about where you would like to go and why.
Cheers - Carsten
E-moderator
Deadline: Thursday 1 September at 22.00 CET.
|
ITLC, - siden er sidst opdateret d.17. januar 2012